FLU VACCINE BECOMES UNPRODUCTIVE IN 91% OF SENIORS
Although this article says the
flu vaccine is ineffective in seniors, in reality the flu vaccine is a major
winner, causing untold numbers of elderly people to develop alzheimers,
dementia, neurological problems, multiple sclerosis, various forms of cancer,
and much more.
The people who create vaccines
are extremely pleased with all of this dysfunction as they reap in billions
annually through all of this illness and they rest peacefully at night knowing
the elderly are so sick, they will never rise up to take their planet back.
Source Article:
Shock CDC Study: Flu Vaccine
Ineffective in 91% of Seniors
http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2013/02/22/shock-cdc-study-flu-vaccine-ineffective-in-91-of-seniors/
"A study released today by
the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows shockingly low rates
of effectiveness for this year’s flu vaccine.
According to the report, the flu
vaccine was effective for only 9% of seniors over 65 years old. In other words,
91% of seniors in the study who were vaccinated still ended up getting the flu.
The CDC showed somewhat better
results for younger persons. They claimed that the flu vaccine was effective
for 58% of those aged 6 months-17 years, 46% for persons aged 18–49 years, and
50% for persons aged 50–64 years.
Overall, the CDC claimed this
year’s flu vaccine was “moderately effective” and made the unprovable claim
that “influenza vaccination reduced the risk for medical visits resulting from
influenza A and B by 56%.”
But since young people generally
have stronger immune systems than seniors it’s unclear how many of the younger
test subjects would not have gotten the flu whether they were vaccinated or
not.
It seems that the figure for
seniors is far more accurate as to the actual effectiveness of the vaccine
precisely because they have weaker immune systems.
One would think these dismal
numbers should dampen the CDC’s enthusiasm for flu vaccines, but it seems to
have done just the opposite. The CDC claims that the figures for younger adults
“confirm the benefits” and “offers further support” for annual flu vaccines.
The editors of the report state:
Confirmation of the protective
benefits of the 2012–13 influenza vaccine among persons aged 6 months–64 years
offers further support for the public health benefit of annual seasonal
influenza vaccination and supports the expansion of vaccination, particularly
among younger age groups.
The CDC called the woefully low
effectiveness in seniors “nonsignificant”, only that it “reinforces the need
for continued advances in influenza vaccines,” and that “vaccines remain the
best preventive tool available.”
The nonsignificant adjusted VE of
9% against A (H3N2) among persons aged ≥65 years is similar to the estimate in
a recent interim report from Europe (6) and reinforces the need for continued
advances in influenza vaccines, especially to increase protective benefits for
older adults.
One possible explanation for
these findings is that some older adults did not mount an effective immune
response to the influenza A (H3N2) component of this season’s vaccine.
Nonetheless, this finding should not discourage future vaccination by persons
aged ≥65 years, who are at greater risk for more severe cases and complications
from influenza. Influenza vaccines remain the best preventive tool available.
However, according to their own
data, a strong immune system is the best preventative measure against the flu,
but Big Pharma doesn’t make any money from that.
Finally, the CDC concludes the
report with a recommendation to increase the use of flu vaccines; ”This report
highlights the value of both increasing the use of influenza vaccines,
especially among children and young adults, and continuing efforts to develop
more effective vaccines and vaccination strategies.”
If a 91% failure rate is “nonsignificant”
to the CDC, what level of failure must be reached for them to disavow
vaccines?"
0 comments:
Post a Comment